What is the difference between the logical problem of evil and the evidential problem of evil?

February 2023 · 6 minute read
The logical form of the argument tries to show a logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil, while the evidential form tries to show that given the evil in the world, it is improbable that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God.

Also know, what is the evidential problem of evil?

The evidential problem of evil is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil (or certain instances, kinds, quantities, or distributions of evil) constitutes evidence against the existence of God, that is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness.

Beside above, what is the deductive problem of evil? Greg lays out a classic argument that God does not exist, called 'The Problem of Evil'. He distinguishes two versions of that argument, which are sometimes called 'the deductive' and 'the evidential' version. He goes into some details on the deductive version.

People also ask, what is logical problem of evil?

The logical problem of evil claims that God's omnipotence, omniscience and supreme goodness would completely rule out the possibility of evil and that the existence of evil would do the same for the existence of a supreme being.

What are the three Theodicies?

For theodicies of suffering, Weber argued that three different kinds of theodicy emerged—predestination, dualism, and karma—all of which attempt to satisfy the human need for meaning, and he believed that the quest for meaning, when considered in light of suffering, becomes the problem of suffering.

What is the definition of evil in the Bible?

In the Old Testament, evil is understood to be an opposition to God as well as something unsuitable or inferior such as the leader of the fallen angels Satan In the New Testament the Greek word poneros is used to indicate unsuitability, while kakos is used to refer to opposition to God in the human realm.

What are horrendous evils?

Adams defines "horrendous evils" as "evils that participation in which (that is, the doing or suffering of which) constitutes prima facie reason to doubt whether the participant's life could (given their inclusion in it( be a great good to him/her on the whole" (26).

What does moral evil mean?

Moral evil is any morally negative event caused by the intentional action or inaction of an agent, such as a person. An example of a moral evil might be murder, or any other evil event for which someone can be held responsible or culpable.

What does natural evil mean?

Natural evil is evil for which "no non-divine agent can be held morally responsible for its occurrence." Others reject this definition; for example, Christian theologians argue that natural evil is the indirect result of original sin just as moral evils are, though moral evil is “caused by human activity” directly.

What are types of evil?

There are two main types of evil:

Is God omnipotent quote?

One of the earliest uses of the trilemma formulation is that of the Greek philosopher Epicurus, rejecting the idea of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent god (as summarised by David Hume): If God is unable to prevent evil, then he is not all-powerful. If God is not willing to prevent evil, then he is not all-good.

What theist means?

Theism is broadly defined as the belief in the existence of a Supreme Being or deities. The claim that the existence of any deity is unknown or unknowable is agnosticism.

What is the point of Pascal's wager?

Pascal's wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, mathematician and physicist, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). It posits that humans bet with their lives that God either exists or does not.

Can God create a rock he Cannot lift?

The omnipotent being cannot create a stone it cannot lift. The omnipotent being cannot create such a stone because its power is equal to itself—thus, removing the omnipotence, for there can only be one omnipotent being, but it nevertheless retains its omnipotence.

Can God do the logically impossible?

The Understanding Paradox 1. If God can do anything, even logically impossible acts, then he can both exist and not exist at the same time; he can and cannot eliminate evil; he can be all powerful and not all powerful; he can be infinitely good and not infinitely good, and so on.

What does theodicy mean in philosophy?

Theodicy, (from Greek theos, “god”; dikē, “justice”), explanation of why a perfectly good, almighty, and all-knowing God permits evil. Theodicies and defenses are two forms of response to what is known in theology and philosophy as the problem of evil.

How is Omnibenevolent?

Omnibenevolence. Christians believe that God loved humanity so much that he chose to send Jesus to Earth so that people could have eternal life.

How does the free will defense respond to the logical problem of evil?

A variety of arguments have been offered in response to the problem of evil, and some of them have been used in both theodicies and defenses. One argument, known as the free will defense, claims that evil is caused not by God but by human beings, who must be allowed to choose evil if they are to have free will.

Who first introduced the concept of theodicy?

Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) as painted by Sandro Botticelli ( c. 1445 – 1510). Augustine is credited with developing the first form of the theodicy now named for him.

What is the free will defense in philosophy?

Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense is a logical argument developed by the American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil. Plantinga's argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by the philosopher J.

What is the argument from evil?

The Argument from Evil is a class of arguments which purport that the existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of God. As Hume put it, "Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

Who came up with the cosmological argument?

The history of this argument goes back to Aristotle or earlier, was developed in Neoplatonism and early Christianity and later in medieval Islamic theology during the 9th to 12th centuries, and re-introduced to medieval Christian theology in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas.

ncG1vNJzZmiemaOxorrYmqWsr5Wne6S7zGiuoZmkYra0edOhnGacmZuzpr7Ep5qeZZKawbixxKdkraCVYrmws8icmKVloKe8o7jEpmSonl2aw6q4jJqlnWWknbJusdWim56mpJ6urXnPq6abpJWierCyjJ6toqQ%3D